jkeny wrote: > > No, this is exactly what is wrong with your approach - test for the > wrong thing & when nothing is found, add to the doubt about the efficacy > of the device. >
Isn't honest skepticism a healthy thing? I've read and quoted the vendor's top level description of this device and it seems like it is close to being a panacea. It seems like someone could test for just about any USB interface vice and this product would address it. I've also read a article of many in an less-than-totally conspicuous list of blog posts where in technical words of art the vendor seems (to me) to admit that the device has pronounced limitations, and as I understand it, its standing as a panacea for USB-related audible ills is very questionable. We have before us a person who seems to have documented USB-related audible ills in his audio system. It appears that his problem may not be addressed by this device, and he has explained why. He seems to be criticized, called names, and generally abused for his trouble. However, the glowing panacea-like claims for this device remain in a highly conspicuous place on the vendor's web site, while the highly technical caveats seem to be hidden away in a blog. If the device were described transparently up front, it seems like this situation would have never come up. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
