SBGK wrote: 
> JS has said he has measured noise, that's enough for me. 

Well you are way ahead of me, could you provide a link to that
statement?

> 
> What he describes accords with my experience of what affects SQ. Your
> viewpoint doesn't.
> 

Please describe the reliable means that you have used to observe SQ.

> 
> There are plenty of windbags on the interweb who claim to have never
> heard any difference and want to enforce that view on others, why they
> can't just let people hear what they want to hear and discuss it like
> sensible adults still bemuses me.

Well that's not me. You may have read that I feel that you are free to
determine SQ by any means and share it, but of course I will use logic
and reason and experience to evaluate it. 

Are you against the use of logic and reason and experience?

There are plenty of placebophiles on the web who claim to have heard any
difference no matter how improbable, no matter how flawed their means of
evaluation, and want to enforce that view on others. 

Why they can't just let people hear what they want to hear they way they
want to hear it and discuss it like sensible adults?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to