It appears to me that what is being demonstrated here is an attempt at supporting Cliveb's conclusion based on a "blind test" that would hardly be considered in any way reliable or scientific. And yet we hear such phrases as "violently anti-scientific" being paraded for the reader
If you continue to support the invalid conclusions from invalid blind tests such as cliveb's then I will continue to draw attention to the hypocrisy in your position. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103776 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
