Wombat wrote: > We just lately had a thread at Hydrogen where someone did positive abx > with the Babyface playback at 44.1k against 192k. He was not able to abx > the same file with 192k->44.1k->192k i prepared with sox for 192k > playback. So yes, the Babyface itself should really produce clearly > different outputs for different samplerates. > The thread starts about Naim but leads to the above conclusion. > http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=108758&hl=naim%20sample&st=0
Is the correct interpretation of the above: When Naim did the downsampling 192 -> 44.1 there was an audible loss in the downsampling 192 -> 44.1, but when you did the 192 -> 44.1 downsampling with Sox, there was no audible difference? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
