jkeny wrote: > The speculation comes in the continuation of your post which you omitted > _\"__I_guess_the_non-audiophile_in_me_tends_to_go_\"and_if_the_differences_are_that_small,_does_it_actually_matter?\",_as_in_\"does_a_difference_so_small_that_I_have_to_go_through_extreme_measures_to_hear_it_actually_affect_my_enjoyment_of_the_music?\"_. >
Huh? Yes, that was indeed speculation, as clearly indicated by the question marks, and also clearly flagged as a personal opinion/position. I am very specifically talking about *my* enjoyment of music. > Examples, please! I suggest you re-read the thread you linked to. > For him, it is a provable reality & that is the point to anybody > endeavouring to verify whether their sighted perception is not a > "delusion". Of course, your feigned "scientific" rigour is just an > insatiable demand for further tests when the results are not to your > liking It really seems you have no idea what "provable reality" means. If I state that I have seen an alien spacecraft, and seen it with a properly calibrated and tested telescope, does that make alien spacecraft "provable reality"? > It's not just a conclusion from that test - it's well documented in the > BS.1116 standards. Can you please point to the section that you think supports your claims? Anyway, how is any of this in any way relevant to the original thread? "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
