Wombat wrote: > We just lately had a thread at Hydrogen where *someone* did positive abx > with the Babyface playback at 44.1k against 192k. He was not able to abx > the same file with 192k->44.1k->192k i prepared with sox for 192k > playback. So yes, the Babyface itself should really produce clearly > different outputs for different samplerates. > The thread starts about Naim but leads to the above conclusion. > http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=108758&hl=naim%20sample&st=0
It wasn't just *someone*, it was the same guy as I referenced in the my links - ultmusicsnob in those links & ultimatemusicsnob on HA His objective with his ABX testing was to determine if 16/44 was audibly different to 24/192 on his equipment & not to make any universal claim about RB audio Vs high-res audio differences - so your providing a 16/44 file in a 192K carrier packet is of no importance to him as it is not the way he (or anybody else) listens to RB audio. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
