arnyk wrote: > Is the correct interpretation of the above: When Naim did the > downsampling 192 -> 44.1 there was an audible loss in the downsampling > 192 -> 44.1, but when you did the 192 -> 44.1 downsampling with Sox, > there was no audible difference? Please read the thread again. The files naim offered were different in phase, loudnes and lenght. They were meant to check if gear can play back different samplerates not for the test of how they sound. Of course they could have done better. When we were at it we did better and the OP could abx 44.1 downsampled from 192 on the Babyface but not 192->44.1->192.
Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
