SBGK wrote: > you keep hawking abx testing as being the gold standard, but as far as I > can see it is totally irrelevent to anyone actually listening for > changes. It's only used by objectivists who always claim to never have > heard a difference, so what sort of endorsement is that ?
"Objectivists who always claim to never have heard a difference" - not even a straw man, maybe a straw puppy? But someone is definitely grasping at straws. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
