jkeny wrote: > It doesn't give anyone great hope that these home administered blind > tests are in any way useful at discerning differences, does it?
No, they are indeed pretty useless, just like home administered sighted tests. So would you have any results of carefully controlled (according to the ITU standards that you seem to have become fond of quoting since I pointed them out to you) sighted listening tests that would support any of the claims made in this thread that you could share with us? "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
