jkeny wrote: > The question has no meaning I think we disagree on that one.
> would addressing it change the fact that home administered blind tests > are worthless - something you agree with, btw? And you accuse others of deflecting inconvenient questions? It does show that you try to discredit blind tests based on criteria that you would never apply to sighted tests. According to you, blind tests are worthless, but sighted tests without any controls are totally OK. In many ways, your argumentation reminds me of creationists, who very selectively apply the few scientific words they have learned in an attempt to mislead an uneducated lay audience. Too bad some of us actually understand the science. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
