drmatt wrote: > So I see, a pity the commercial world doesn't like open source. >
Open source = no royalty payments. > > I believe FLAC achieves better compression, no? > Reference? > > I understand blu ray, at least, does also support up to at least six > 24/96k pcm audio streams (which would be about 13Mbit). I make that > about 4 hours of six channel high res audio per single sided blu ray, or > obviously 12 hours of two channel.. bring it on! No more pointless > multidisc sets.. (and obviously ridiculously long runtimes for 16/44.1 > etc..) > Who cares since we know that so-called high resolution audio has no audible benefits? > > I'm old fashioned, I like to buy a piece of media rather than a > too-easily accidentally deleted download but am slowly realising the > fact that I never actually play anything directly from media anyway.. I can't say that I'm against physical media, not with a personal library in excess of 1,000 discs. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105070 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
