arnyk wrote: > Most of the above is about how identical sounding hardware can be > perceived as sounding different and ranked by someone who will not hold > to the relevant Science (is he ignorant of it or just plain willfull?) > which says that they are sonically indistinguishable. > > In the case of TDA 1534 and a few others the claim lacks necessary > details. They are extra susceptible to being intentionally incorrectly > implemented and actually sounding different, in *some* (but not all) > configurations. They are the SETs of the DAC world - a retro product > intentionally implemented to function as tone controls, and not as good > amplifiers or DACs.
So ummmmm what's your point? All DAC chips sound the same and 1534s sound bad? To you.... Well you obviously don't have golden ears. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ edwardthern's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66099 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106575 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
