Golden Earring wrote: > I wholeheartedly agree with the methodology of double blind testing. > > However you have already persuaded yourself that the result would be a > foregone conclusion. That is hardly a scientific approach, is it? > > Dave :)
What's foregone is your ability to read. Here's what was written: "All I can say is that the differences you report are unlikely enough that it justifies verifying them with controlled double blind listening." Your false transformation of that into a "foregone conclusion" is itself often the consequence of a foregone conclusion. What's unclear about the word "unlikely"? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106519 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
