Golden Earring wrote: 
> 
> 
> However the question arises as to whether a 24/96 format recording might
> actually sound -*worse*- than 16/44.1 on account of the anti-aliasing
> filtering not being applied until a much higher frequency, which
> potentially would permit the onward transmission of signals above the
> upper limit of human hearing into my amplifier & loudspeakers.
> 

A proper job of upsampling avoids this problem.  Anti-aliasing is part
of a good implementation of upsampling.  This results in a 24/96 file
that lacks any meaningful content above 22 KHz.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106519

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to