arnyk wrote: 
> Wrong and wrong.

Chill, actually I didn't disagree with what you wrote...

Alongside also means "at the same time as or in coexistence with".

> 
> So, the audio track was not along side the video track, it was under it
> as I previously suggested.
> 
> So the sound quality was not poor, but vastly better than any other
> contemporaneous format. It was certainly better than the LP or consumer
> analog tape, either open reel or cassette tape.

And yes I also knew roughly how Hifi Stereo worked, and yes it was good
in any speed (that I also didn't disagree with). I stated that there
also existed some VHS decks that didn't use this form of "Hifi" stereo
but still offered stereo sound using a two channel head in place of the
standard mono linear audio head. It predated AFM hifi Stereo and
unsurprisingly wasn't very good... and isn't therefore "wrong".



--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106519

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to