are you willing to actually do something constructive or just happy to continue 
to sling mostly repetitive inflammatory mud.

> On 14 Feb 2017, at 5:38 PM, Mike Borgelt <mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> At 06:12 AM 2/12/2017, you wrote:
> 
>> So the LAW provides that after 40hours of tuition and post solo flying  a 
>> PPL(A) holder can throw his wife and kids in a plane and fly across 
>> Australia.
>> 
>> What makes gliding so special? Why does only 10% of power time count towards 
>> an independent operators ticket when your glider time counts 100% for a PPL 
>> (CASR 61.070)?
>> 
>> The accident statistics expressed as accidents/fatalities per 100,000 hours 
>> are flawed when it comes to gliding. The hours flown in gliders supplied to 
>> BITRE by GFA are clearly a fabrication. The latest published report is 2013:
>> 
>> 
>> <aedfc531.png> 
>> 
>> It is generally acknowledged that  there are less than 700 gliders with 
>> Form2's and consequently capable of being flown. If 700 aircraft flew 
>> 182,500 hours the average per aircraft is about 260 hours per aircraft - 
>> obviously BS.
>> 
>> The best guess estimate would be closer to 40,000 hours in which case the 
>> accident rate would be 3 to 4 times higher.
>> 
>> These assertions are supported by the BITRE report from 2004:
>> 
>> <aedfc541.png> 
>> 
>> Note that the hours per aircraft are around 60 hours per annum (even if all 
>> were airworthy) and the hours per launch is around 0.7.(by 2013 this had 
>> doubled) Note also the consistent decline in the hours flown and the lack of 
>> statistics for 2000 -2004.
>> 
>> It can only be concluded that any accident rate claimed for gliding is not 
>> based on fact and is most likely 3-4 times higher than claimed.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> So everybody here is OK with silly restrictions on experienced pilots imposed 
> by a system that cannot even maintain quality or discipline on the instructor 
> body? Or report honestly to the government when required to.
> 
> That Beverley crash (I won't call these accidents) is disgraceful. As was the 
> Ararat crash and a similar crash with somewhat less tragic outcome at 
> Beverley a few years before that. How many more of these instructors  are 
> lurking in the system?
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> Borgelt Instruments - design & manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation 
> since 1978
> www.borgeltinstruments.com
> tel:   07 4635 5784     overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
> mob: 042835 5784                 :  int+61-42835 5784
> P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au
> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to