Interesting, but potentially meaningless as the study acknowledges that the it cannot differentiate between the many limitations that have been applied at the same time.
Given the information from the study below, is 100 hours counter productive? Supervised driving 40 hours: ■ 16-year-old crash rates 21 percent lower Supervised driving 50 hours: ■ 16-year-old crash rates 15 percent lower Cheers Paul Cheers Paul On 11 February 2017 at 13:57, Stuart Wolf <stuac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> >> >>> >> So there is an actual evidence to show this, properly corrected for >> variables that may have also produced this results. Better cars, roads come >> to mind, I am sure there are others. >> >> Are there less accidents for drivers certified under the new system? . >> > > Yep > > https://www.nhtsa.gov/document/traffic-tech-meta- > analysis-graduated-driver-licensing-laws-effectiveness-specific-program > > A meta analysis of America GDL > > _______________________________________________ > Aus-soaring mailing list > Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au > http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring > >
_______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
