Question: Is it possible to pass a PCI audit, while potentially bound to silence regarding:
- source integrity - secret functionality - undisclosed 3rd party end points I suppose auditors can qualify any report that mandated TCNs/TANs are excepted, but are you then "PCI Compliant"? Kind regards Paul Wilkins On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 13:03, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, well almost elevated to Federal Parliament. > > On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 12:55, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The turnup on Saturday with the elevation of Kerryn Phelps to Federal >> Parliament means a very different playing field for Dutton. It's one thing >> to ask Labor to pass a Bill in the Senate whose function is (supposedly) a >> House of Review. Now Dutton has to get the Bill through not 1 but 2 houses, >> and more importantly, the Lower House effectively authors Bills. Labor is >> less likely to support the Bill in the Lower House. >> >> Phelps said prior to the election the purpose of independents is to "hold >> the government to account, not to ransom", so we'll have to wait and see. >> Her stated priorities are environment and refugees, so obviously won't want >> to scrape off the shiny new mint of political capital on Law and Order >> issues, but she's been a strong human rights advocate, and the Bill raises >> serious human rights issues. >> >> Kind regards >> >> Paul Wilkins >> >> >> On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 15:28, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> If you're concerned by the Bill's overreach, where it allows for >>> arbitrary and disproportionate interference in privacy, write the >>> Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights: human.rig...@aph.gov.au >>> >>> Kind regards >>> Paul Wilkins >>> >>> On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 11:31, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Appeared this morning. Runs to 60pp vs 20pp for the Home Affairs >>>> submission. >>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=859d9cda-0f99-4bef-994f-edc6006c87bf&subId=661321 >>>> >>>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 11:55, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'd also venture the roll call for Friday is in no small degree window >>>>> dressing for Saturday's Wentworth turnout. I did forward my letter to >>>>> PJCIS >>>>> onto Kerryn Phelps. >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards >>>>> >>>>> Paul Wilkins >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 11:48, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The Committee is currently accepting submissions to this review. >>>>>> Submissions should be provided no later than *12pm, Friday, 12 >>>>>> October 2018.* An initial Public Hearing is expected to be held on >>>>>> Friday, 19 October 2018. *Further Public Hearings will be scheduled >>>>>> for late October or early November 2018.* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018 >>>>>> <https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018>* >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 11:44, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Optus (Singtel)'s submission was soft touch, saying they'll impose >>>>>>> whatever's required by government dictate. Pretty much to be expected >>>>>>> given >>>>>>> their parent company is Singapore based. As Rob points out, most making >>>>>>> submissions won't be heard from. I'd go so far as to say this is by >>>>>>> design. >>>>>>> Some very critical views are not to be heard from. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kind regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul Wilkins >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 21:13, Robert Hudson <hud...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The schedule for the first day of public hearings on the 19th of >>>>>>>> October (this Friday) has been released: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?hearingid=28560&submissions=false >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For those who don't wish to download the PDF document, the >>>>>>>> following parties are scheduled to speak on this day: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * The Department of Home Affairs. >>>>>>>> * The Law Council of Australia. This is an interesting one - it >>>>>>>> appears (unless my eyes are failing me) that they did not make a >>>>>>>> submission >>>>>>>> at all (or at least not one that the PJCIS has chosen to publish - >>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>> submission numbering goes to 66, yet their website counts only 64 >>>>>>>> submissions - submissions 12 and 14 are missing). >>>>>>>> * Optus "and others TBC". >>>>>>>> * Ai Group "and others TBC" (interestingly, Ai Group is only one of >>>>>>>> the parties involved in the cited submission - so they can't even >>>>>>>> attribute >>>>>>>> the submissions to the correct/complete groups). >>>>>>>> * Amazon, BSA | The Software Alliance "and others TBC" (noting that >>>>>>>> the BSA submission is cited in the submissions pack for the day, but >>>>>>>> Amazon's isn't - and nor is it listed on the main list of submissions). >>>>>>>> * TBC. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There's a pack of submissions (4 of them) relevant for the day - >>>>>>>> it's here if anyone's keen (particularly useful given some of the >>>>>>>> oddities >>>>>>>> I'll mention next): >>>>>>>> https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?hearingid=28560&submissions=true >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Each is allocated a different time frame as well - DOHA have 60 >>>>>>>> minutes allocated, the Law Council of Australia get 45 minutes, Optus >>>>>>>> "and >>>>>>>> others TBC" get 45 minutes, Ai Group "and others TBC" receive 60 >>>>>>>> minutes, >>>>>>>> Amazon, BSA | The Software Alliance "and others TBC" receive 75 >>>>>>>> minutes, >>>>>>>> and then the "TBC" section has a start time (3:15pm) but no finish >>>>>>>> time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It concerns me that as of nearly 9pm Sydney time on the 16th of >>>>>>>> October that "and others TBC" and "TBC" is still undefined for hearings >>>>>>>> starting on the 19th of October. I expressed an interest in >>>>>>>> participating >>>>>>>> in the public hearings on behalf of ITPA very early on in the >>>>>>>> consultation >>>>>>>> period - yet IF we do get invited to attend the public hearing on the >>>>>>>> 19th, >>>>>>>> they're giving me very little time to get myself down there (and to be >>>>>>>> honest, I may not be able to attend at this late notice, given I would >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>> to make arrangements both at home and at work for me to travel to >>>>>>>> Canberra >>>>>>>> on Friday). I also can't start to plan for dates that aren't even >>>>>>>> published yet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Another concern is that with "around 65" submissions made, only a >>>>>>>> very small number of organisations have been invited to the public >>>>>>>> hearing >>>>>>>> - I believe there was talk of further public hearing days been added, >>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>> there's no indication of that on the PJCIS website at this stage - >>>>>>>> this is >>>>>>>> particularly concerning when you look at some of the parties NOT yet >>>>>>>> invited - organisations like Cisco, Telstra and Apple in particular >>>>>>>> given >>>>>>>> that Optus, Amazon and BSA are invited). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It will be interesting to see how things continue to run from >>>>>>>> here. At this stage, I am not seeing evidence that the appropriate >>>>>>>> level >>>>>>>> and breadth of consultation will take place to ensure an appropriate >>>>>>>> outcome for Australia. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 17:37, Paul Wilkins < >>>>>>>> paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Robert, >>>>>>>>> When in Canberra, don't look for any support from PJCIS Chairman >>>>>>>>> Andrew Hastie, who is a Dutton supporter, and one of the leading >>>>>>>>> conspirators in rolling Turnbull. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kind regards >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Paul Wilkins >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 12:45, Robert Hudson <hud...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PJCIS is listing 37 submissions - way down on the 343 that were >>>>>>>>>> made to the Department of Home Affairs, but hopefully they'll >>>>>>>>>> actually get >>>>>>>>>> read and considered this time around. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I tried to stick to ITPA's area of expertise (tehnology) in the >>>>>>>>>> hope that other parties more qualified than us have focused on areas >>>>>>>>>> outside of technology - I have strong opinions in those areas, but >>>>>>>>>> thought >>>>>>>>>> it best to let experts make the points there. I also made it clear >>>>>>>>>> to the >>>>>>>>>> PJCIS that ITPA wishes to be invited to the public hearing, we'll >>>>>>>>>> see how >>>>>>>>>> that goes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Robert >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 10:26, Paul Wilkins < >>>>>>>>>> paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Rob, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I want to say thanks to everyone who's made the effort for >>>>>>>>>>> what's a pretty thankless and costly investment of time - trying to >>>>>>>>>>> convey >>>>>>>>>>> a message that Home Affairs appear intent to ignore. The Home >>>>>>>>>>> Affairs >>>>>>>>>>> consultation was a wash. Let's hope PJCIS actually engage with the >>>>>>>>>>> process. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> However if you don't engage with the process, you can't complain >>>>>>>>>>> about the results, so thanks again to those who've made submissions >>>>>>>>>>> (Home >>>>>>>>>>> Affairs and then again for PJCIS) to see that our industry's needs >>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>> represented and, if not acknowledged, are at least on the public >>>>>>>>>>> record to >>>>>>>>>>> hold Home Affairs to account for what's some pretty imperious >>>>>>>>>>> unilateralism >>>>>>>>>>> and shabby disregard for the industry's and the public's concerns >>>>>>>>>>> and best >>>>>>>>>>> interests. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Paul Wilkins >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 09:46, Robert Hudson <hud...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have just sent through my submission on behalf of ITPA. It's >>>>>>>>>>>> also published here: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.itpa.org.au/news/itpa-submission-pjcis-telecommunications-and-other-legislation-amendment-assistance-and-access-bill-/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "" >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 17:17, Paul Wilkins < >>>>>>>>>>>> paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> My submission is now up on PJCIS . Worth a read for anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>> interested. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018/Submissions >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Wilkins >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 15:05, Paul Wilkins < >>>>>>>>>>>>> paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh ho!! Now the rush behind the bill all makes sense - so the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFP can go after whoever leaked against Dutton and his au pairs! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/oct/11/afp-search-raids-affairs-department-peter-dutton-au-pair-visa-leaks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Glad we cleared that up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Wilkins >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 12:33, Paul Wilkins < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dep't Home Affairs submission to PJCIS has turned up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=8704d357-2f09-4173-871a-f073166d4e10&subId=660956 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Wilkins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 12:14, Christian Heinrich < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> christian.heinr...@cmlh.id.au> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:01 PM Paul Wilkins < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Good job peeps, 24 hours before submissions close with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JCIS. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are 343 listed as of today (Thursday). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian Heinrich >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cmlh.id.au/contact >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> AusNOG mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> AusNOG mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> AusNOG mailing list >>>>>>>>> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net >>>>>>>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog