Tony Schreiner wrote:
> I am running a fairly small BackupPC on a Solaris 10 machine ( 6  
> clients, maybe about 200 GB total backup) . Backup directory on ZFS,  
> but I haven't tried any tricks with ZFS yet.
> I've had no operational problems. I am using my own version of perl  
> rather than the system default.

I don't know enough about it to even ask the question right but I've 
wondered if the zfs send/recv facilities can deal with backuppc's huge 
number of hardlinks efficiently enough to make offsite copies of the 
archive - especially with its incremental mode.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to