Tony Schreiner wrote: > I am running a fairly small BackupPC on a Solaris 10 machine ( 6 > clients, maybe about 200 GB total backup) . Backup directory on ZFS, > but I haven't tried any tricks with ZFS yet. > I've had no operational problems. I am using my own version of perl > rather than the system default.
I don't know enough about it to even ask the question right but I've wondered if the zfs send/recv facilities can deal with backuppc's huge number of hardlinks efficiently enough to make offsite copies of the archive - especially with its incremental mode. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/