On Sep 13, 2007, at 12:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Tony Schreiner wrote: >> I am running a fairly small BackupPC on a Solaris 10 machine ( 6 >> clients, maybe about 200 GB total backup) . Backup directory on >> ZFS, but I haven't tried any tricks with ZFS yet. >> I've had no operational problems. I am using my own version of >> perl rather than the system default. > > I don't know enough about it to even ask the question right but > I've wondered if the zfs send/recv facilities can deal with > backuppc's huge number of hardlinks efficiently enough to make > offsite copies of the archive - especially with its incremental mode. > > -- > Les Mikesell > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dunno at this point. But I have empty disk space available to experiment. I'm not that knowledgeable about ZFS, but I'll spend some time reading up. Tony ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
