On 11/28/2016 01:33 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote: > On Monday 2016-11-28 12:22:36 Jaime Ferrer Hepp wrote: >> Yes, you are correct. But having all under /opt/bacula ease the process >> of disaster recovery, despite the fact that location of files varies >> depending on the distribution. > > For the disaster recovery I am starting with the premise that everything > is lost except the volumes in the secondary backup storage. From those > volumes using the bextract tool I am able to get the bacula server up and > running.
For me it is easier to use the .bsr file that Bacula emails me each evening to get back the complete Bacula environment. No need to use bextract. > > After that I am using centos rescue environment (provided as a part of > the installation dvd) and statically compiled bacula binary. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
