On 14 Apr 2000, Colin Rafferty wrote:
> Sergei Pokrovsky writes:
>
> >>>>> That's an occasion to present my feature request. It would be
> >>>>> nice if the Supercite's attribution were a searchable key
> >>>>> field, like AKA.
> Colin> That's because I had a typo in my code. Here is the correct
> Colin> incantation:
>
> Colin> M-x bbdb-notes RET cite RET Phil
>
> > Alas, neither this helps. I get [No match] and beep :(
>
> Is the problem that it doesn't know `bbdb-notes', or that it doesn't
> know the field `cite'? If the former, then you are doing something
> wrong. If the latter, then you should try `attribution' (which is
> your field) rather than `cite' (which is my field):
Well, I just tried it (on a field gebirtstag :-).
It doesn't work when I try it from a fresh xemacs session (bbdb not started
yet). When it asks for the notes-field, it doesn't know of any of them but
"notes". If you select to search all, it does _search_ (and find) all,
though.
Doing the same from a bbdb started up already simply works fine for "all",
"notes" or whatever custom field I have.
Jochen
--
http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de
Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit
Libert`e, `Egalit`e, Fraternit`e
Sex, drugs and rock-n-roll
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/bbdb-info
