On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On February 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
> Oh dear. I've just realised what the problem is. bbdb-initialize does
> (load "bbdb-autoloads"), IIRC. D'oh. I'm leaving the above text to
> show you that I am an idiot who misses the obvious from time to
> time...
*grin* I know the feeling. :)
>> Personally, I don't think that having a BBDB-specific autoloads file
>> is worth the effort, at least on XEmacs.
>
> I inherited it without knowing what it was, to be honest.
*nod*
>> By default, XEmacs generated auto-autoloads.el files *don't* have
>> this `already loaded' lossage. I don't know if GNU Emacs supports
>> them, but if it did...
>
> Um. It's inserted by batch-update-autoloads.
Hrm. So, why doesn't it show up with my personal auto-generated
autoloads...
So it does. How terribly noxious. I become more glad that I rolled my
own update-autoloads code in my startup files.
I do apologise for that.
[...]
>> *grin* Ain't nothing worse than needing to understand the other
>> religion as well.
>
> Yah; it's the gratuituous differences that annoy me. Like overlays
> vs. extents, for example, and the completely incompatible menuing
> systems.
Personally I miss the dumping of `cl' and things like
`replace-in-string' in the GNU Emacs. The overlays/extents thing does
not bother me much, I admit, but that's because XEmacs does have a
compatibility layer.
*shrug*
Daniel
--
My hands, unfaithful, did not protect me
My voice, transparent, when I need it to scream
What really happened during those nights?
I could not move so I just turned off inside
-- Switchblade Symphony, _Fear_ (Calamities)
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
