On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Sriram Karra <karra....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, February 2, 2013, Roland Winkler wrote
>
>>
>> Currently I am hesitant to make such changes because it could become
>> difficult to ensure the overall consistency between what happens in
>> different parts of BBDB. I'll keep your patch in mind, but I do not
>> want to promise that I want to add such a patch in the near future.
>
>
> Cool.
>
Although I leave the final call on this to you, I am just a bit curious
because I feel your position stated above is somewhat different from the
one in our earlier thread, reproduced in part below. Specifically I took
the earlier conversation to mean you had agreed that we could put in some
filtering out code right now, even before we find a valid use case for
having text properties in the database. Was it just a misunderstanding on
my part?
> Roland said:
>
> > Sriram said:
> >
> > > Roland said:
> > >
> > > Yet all the text processing in between the grabbing of text
> > > strings and adding them to the database should preserve text
> > > properties.
> >
> > Makes a lot of sense. And we could do all this even before we come
> > up with any real use of having text properties in the database,
> > making it more flexible but keeping the database format more
> > predictable for those who desire it to be so.
>
> Exactly.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
