On Sat Feb 2 2013 Sriram Karra wrote: > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Roland Winkler <wink...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Following recent discussions with Sriram on this list, the > patch below tries to avoid more carefully that text properties > accidentally enter BBDB. > > Great! I am not familiar with BBDB internals enough to understand > the full patch, but I assume you mean any MUA action is guaranteed > not to introduce any text properties into the db?
I have done a few more tests, and I am still confused how the text properties ended up in BBDB. So without knowing the loophole, I am hesitant to claim that it got fixed and BBDB could guarantee not to introduce any text properties into the db. > I was working on a configuration variable based low-level control > to filter out stuff. The attached patch tries to do that by fixing > the bbdb-defstruct macro. Do you think it will work for all cases? Currently I am hesitant to make such changes because it could become difficult to ensure the overall consistency between what happens in different parts of BBDB. I'll keep your patch in mind, but I do not want to promise that I want to add such a patch in the near future. I find it more important to pay attention that high-level code does not feeed text properties to BBDB unintentionally. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
