On Jan 21, 2003 Noah Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since Mulberry is designed from the ground up with IMAP in mind, we > tried introducing our users to it when we moved to IMAP, but every last > one of them ran screaming from the interface. We have not a single > Mulberry user here today.
I'm primarily a Pine user, but find that I use OE to deal with attachments. I've found it to be the best all-around IMAP client with a decent GUI, which isn't saying much. :-) I had to try Mulberry...tried it years ago but don't remember what it looked like. Just tried it and, despite what look like some very nice IMAP features, I can't get over the user interface. About as bad as Eudora, and I was an early user of Eudora, and a big fan for a while. It just doesn't do IMAP very well. The emergence of IMAP and the software vendors' collective inability to come up with a decent Windows IMAP client has been surprising, to say the least. But then most people seem to just run Outlook and wouldn't know a bad or good email client if it smacked them upside the head. Mac users have it pretty good with Entourage. -Dave --- Send mail for the `bblisa' mailing list to `[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Mail administrative requests to `[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
