"You will find an advert for Don Mattioda and a course with rates.
I have a copy of the course and do not recommend it to the serious user, as it
does not use modern instruments "
Gil. Some of the most successful and advanced Agricultural
radionic work in the world is being done here in Australia right now using Don
Mattioda instruments. I know the practicioner personally and have seen the
results of his work. It is happening right under your nose!!
The "Base 44" and "Base Ten" Rate books from Keys and the Radionic
Association are only available as part of their three and a half year courses.
The Base 44 system is far and away the best system for analysis and the rates
and instruments, as far as I understand are only available as part of proper
training.
While I agree with you in the cautionary approach to
medical use and also think that Wes is kind of putting the cart before the
horse with his letter I think it is important to make the distinction between
Agricultural and Human Medical usage. Which at least in the US one is
(legally) OK and the other will land you in the calaboose fast! I think you
are trying too hard to make the learning and Agricultural use of radionics a
select privelege of an anointed few.
The Rae Card based instruments are of very limited use without the Base 44
analysis instrument.
NO! I Dont agree!! You would have to break my arm to get my
card potentiser off me. My analysis system has been good instinct, the right
mental attitude, and a pendulum. I have done a lot of good work on my
farm using the above and have not had to pay some high priced guru at every
turn along the way.
It is rather like the several happy folk who wander the world offering
instant enlightenment in matters Radionic, in a space of between one and six
days.
I suppose you include Arden Andersen here?
Outside very limited areas, such as using Hugh Lovel's Rae Cards for BD and
a few complimentary additional cards, it is really important to take detailed
and specific training.
I think that anyone that gets to Hugh Lovels level of
expertise in any area no matter how limited should probably be congratulated
and highly delighted with their success! That aside I fail to see how
integrating radionics into the growing of crops and raising of livestock is a
"very limited area" - looks a pretty big and diverse patch to
me.
If I have not all ready made my point, I would note that many of the
leading names in Radionics died young and mainly from cancer. Malcolm Rae and
David Tansley among them. A key figure died in September, who I will not name
at this stage, at an age and from a cause one would not expect. There is a
recognised risk to practitioners who do not know what they are doing, in that
it is possible to accept the problem of the client.
If you read Don Mattioda's little "not for the serious user"
course book, you would see where he specifically counsels against Radiestheisa
involvement by the operator which he says leads to the operator taking on
board the symptoms, such as you refer to, from the person being treated. This
is a real issue and involving radiestheisea seems to be more of a
problem for those using the English system and instruments than it is for the
Americans
In the US, one should contact Little Farm Research, in the UK, Keys or the
Radionic Association. In Oz or nearby, talk to me.
There are several other operators doing good Agricultural
radionic work in Australia
Room for an amateur or two in this?
Cheers
Lloyd Charles
