> So I very much support the wish that we who > are experimenting with radionics can and will learn from out mistakes. The > mistakes are manifold and the learning process is rather slow, though it > does seem to be incremental. It is important that we honestly and publicly > acknowledge and discuss these mistakes. While it may seem embarassing, it is > a sign of egoic maturity when we publically acknowledge our mistakes. You > might take a second look at any political figures who do this sort of thing, > as it is as much needed as it is rare. > > Anyway, let us please not fall into such traps as labling radionic preps as > "not real" or invalidating the primary making of preps as unnecessary. > Either of these partisan views tends to create divisions. What we need > instead is an open forum for sharing what we know--something we can rely > upon our governments not to do from time to time and case to case. > > Regards, > Hugh
Dear Hugh Thanks for your calming sentiments - I have mostly tried to restrain myself from these kind of debates - radionics vs the other - I find it counterproductive in most cases (negative energy I reckon, or negative use of energy). Occasionally the temptation gets too great and I fall back in the hole again! Ah well - guess we learn a little each time. Hope you are enjoying your trip down under - the country sure is looking heaps better than the last time you were out. Cheers Lloyd Charles _______________________________________________ BDNow mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can unsubscribe or change your options at: http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow
