On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:55:57PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: > > I agree with Gianluca. If it was my repo, I'd have it on my own > > site. > > Is that for autonomy reasons? If so, would hosting a fairly-constantly- > updated read-only backup of the gitorious repo help?
No, I'm just not very attracted by the extra features, and I don't like using a browser instead of a shell for administration. > > But you're the lead, Chris, and I don't really care where the > > trunk lives ;). > > But on the other hand, you've made far more commits than anyone else, > so we shouldn't pick a scheme that discourages you. I'm interested in > organizing contributions only to the extent that it means more of them > happen than would if I didn't. :-) Wherever it lives won't discourage me ;). Heck, I've been using bzr ;). > > I'm not really sure what their features are good for, once you > > get past "free hosting" and possibly greater visibility. Having > > a single server would, for example, make it easier to auto-build > > the Sphinx docs after every commit. > > There's an RSS feed for commits, so I agree it's harder, but not > impossible. (They seem to be working on some "web hooks" scheme too.) Another approach: if you're always pushing from the same place, you can put the hooks on the pushing side. -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GPG (http://www.gnupg.org). The GPG signature (if present) will be attached as 'signature.asc'. For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy My public key is at http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~wking/pubkey.txt
pgpOU3khg2Bbx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Be-devel mailing list [email protected] http://void.printf.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/be-devel
