I fully understand why it is a bad idea to change the defaul kernel configuration for kernel 3.8. But I think it might be possible to consider such a change for kernel 3.12 or a future kernel version. I'm sure there are lots of people out there who would like that.
Am Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2014 15:23:01 UTC+1 schrieb RobertCNelson: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:59 AM, <quik...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > > Of course every user can create his own kernel coniguration or even > modify > > the Linux kernel in any way he wants. But if there is any problem he's > > beeing left alone. I think it would be much better to have a default > kernel > > configuration which at least provides simple PREEMPT support. That might > > help people to fight against most simple latency problems. > > > Notice how the github account says "RobertCNelson"? Your welcome to > fork that project and push kernel/image with your modifications. I'm > not psychically forcing my config choices down people's throat. > Everything is setup to easily allow you to rebuild/modify/etc > everything. Maybe I just give too many options. So I have my reasons > for leaving PREEMPT disabled by default and on an old tested v3.8 > kernel, the last thing i'm going to do is radically change the config. > To much of a risk on a kernel in maintenance only mode at this point. > > Regards, > > -- > Robert Nelson > http://www.rcn-ee.com/ > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
