Matthew and all,
I have a couple of questions about the draft in question that, if answered, 
would help me to define my position with regard to its adoption:

1.       The draft is a “bis” draft but it does not contain a section that 
lists the changes vs. RFC 5549 (customary in the “bis” drafts). Am I right to 
guess that the changes introduced by this draft deal exclusively with just the 
routes used with mVPN?

2.       If the answer to the question above is positive, I would agree that 
BESS (that handles mVPN among other things) is the right home for this document 
(SOFTWIRES WG that has delivered RFC 5549 has concluded). Otherwise, I would 
like to understand why adoption by BESS (and not, say, by the IDR WG) is 
considered?

Regards, and lots of thanks in advance,
Sasha

Office: +972-39266302
Cell:      +972-549266302
Email:   alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com

From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 2:37 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/<https://clicktime.symantec.com/375yKLee6q3yvdfTRuJxJrm6H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision%2F>




___________________________________________________________________________

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information 
which is 
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received 
this 
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then 
delete the original 
and all copies thereof.
___________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to