Dear Members, First of all I want to highlight on Mr. Abhishek's point, i.e. "One proof is no single BM member could adopt this job after starting BM in the last 5 years". Abhishek Sir, I agree with you but couldn't understand one thing, if you have proof of not joining full time politics by any of the BM members than what are you doing? Why not you have jumped into full time politics for BM? Why always we want and need a Soldier, but at our neighbor’s house, why so? Just for your kind information there are several BM members who are into full time politics. Some of them are Dr. Akalpita, Dr. Srinivas, Dr. Diwakar and list goes on. There are several BM members who are serving the country in other ways, again for example Mr. Abhishek (Yourself), Mr. Anurag, Mr. Ashutosh, Mr. Mayank, Mr. Amitabh, Ms. Mahek, Ms. Nishu, Dr. Ganesh and again list is endless. Is it necessary that for serving the mother land anyone should be in the full time politics only? Secondly, " 1. Uncertainty of their job. No MLA or MP knows how long he is on his post. In that case, he tries to remain on this by any means." I want to say very first in this that who all are certain about their own job in this world? As to sustain in corporate we all perform our best, than why can't these bullshit politicians perform in their constituency? Who stops them from doing development work? No one... actually they don't have tendency to do good works. If they really do good work in their respective constituency than why can't they be selected for the next time also? Than where is the matter of uncertainty of job for the politicians? Thirdly, I totally agree with Dr. Akalpita saying in her mail "OURS IS NOT A DISCUSSION GROUP BUT ACTION GROUP". I have always found and even several times had a discussion on this with Dr. Akalpita and other Core Committee members that, why always we love only electronic discussions? Why can't we come outside with the same anger? Again human tendency that, all of us love to write big big things from sitting in the cabin under Air Conditioner but non of us dare to come outside. I believe most of our BM members are eligible enough to work as a Consultant or Strategist for the Indian Parliament, Ministers, Prime Minister, Chief Ministers or President but non of them are eligible to become a Social Worker or real Politician, because, for that we need to put our step on road under the Sun rather than sitting in a cabin under the Air Conditioner. I request all of my members please think seriously that for discussion only we have formed BM? We have spent our 5 years on these resultless and endless electronic discussions only. You don't feel that now is the time that we don't require any electronic views but we require it in a vocal form?
Gyanesh Thakur "Mai Bhartiya.... Bharat Mera... Jai Hind... Jai Bharat." --- On Mon, 12/21/09, bharatudaymission <[email protected]> wrote: From: bharatudaymission <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [bm] [Re.]Please think infinite times before you talk about my Mother-Land.... To: [email protected] Date: Monday, December 21, 2009, 8:21 AM Dear Neeraj I will answer your letter point by point: 1) This discussion brings out lot of interesting points These are not interesting points, they are worrying the nation. The point is, if we are Indians, what is common amongst us to be called Indians? 2) division of states, It is important to discuss whether division of states is required, and, as you rightly said, on what grounds. The division should not be on the grounds of language, religion or other points of view but from the point of view of management, growth and development. We have to draw conclusions and then either persuade for their implementation or, incorporate these in BM policy as a political party. 3) I understand that issues like these can affect people at personal level and one need to be appreciative of that. When we are discussing these issues, it is not because they affect us at personal level. Look at people who are discussing. They are not from Andhra Pradesh or Vidarbha. They are from all over India. We discuss these issues so that we bind ourselves as Indians, irrespective of cast, creed, religion, colour or sex. The question that pops up again is: what is common amongst us which binds us together as Indians? 4) However rhetoric full of emotions is what one should avoid because that completely dilutes the argument. I completely agree with you on this. We have to think on these issues as a Nation, but, without emotional attachment to THE Nation, it is not possible to discuss these issues as National issues. 5) Fact based discussion is always interesting to read and react. This is a fact based discussion. The government announced that it will promote division of Andhra Pradesh. This is a fact. Now, we, either as a political party or as deciding authority in democracy, have to discuss whether this government decision is right or wrong, so that we can decide whom to vote for in the forthcoming general election. 6) For instance if any of the learned members of the group can throw lights on new infrastructure projects which have started (or not started) in the new stated post their formation, it will be interesting. I agree we should do this also. But again, not because it forms an interesting reading. We have to discuss these because they are important for our nation building and, OURS IS NOT A DISCUSSION GROUP BUT ACTION GROUP. Let us pledge to take actions on the issues that we discuss. Let us decide on each issue about our opinion as a group on these issues. Jay Bharat Akalpita --- In bharatudaymission@ yahoogroups. com, Neeraj Joshi <neerajjoshi24@ ...> wrote: > > Dear Members, > This discussion brings out lot of interesting points, division of states, > criteria of it, Indians identity overseas, state of affairs in the recently > created states, political parties and their agendas so on and so forth. I > understand that issues like these can affect people at personal level and one > need to be appreciative of that. However rhetoric full of emotions is what > one should avoid because that completely dilutes the argument. Fact based > discussion is always interesting to read and react. For instance if any of > the learned members of the group can throw lights on new infrastructure > projects which have started (or not started) in the new stated post their > formation, it will be interesting. > Regards,
