> > As per the other post that I've just sent, I think the problem is that > > the sanitized headers are a bit out of date. > > It isn't that the sanitized headers are "a bit out of date". Actually, > Iptables is using headers that are not installed at all using > sanitized headers. > > For example, one test looks for $KERNEL_DIR/net, while other tests > look for $KERNEL_DIR/include/linux/... > > Which means in order to work, there would have to be a /usr/net > dir, which will never happen in a sanitized header installation.
Hmmm, what's the 'official' solution then that iptables should be using? If iptables needs those particular headers should they be included in the iptables source? Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
