On 2/7/07, Andrew Beverley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Which means in order to work, there would have to be a /usr/net > > dir, which will never happen in a sanitized header installation.
Another example I just noticed is ipt_NETLINK.c. The test is looking for $KERNEL_DIR/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_NETLINK.c, which obviously isn't going to be anywhere except the kernel source. > Hmmm, what's the 'official' solution then that iptables should be using? > If iptables needs those particular headers should they be included in > the iptables source? That's what people typically do. You'd have to take it up with the netfilter people, though. I'd need some evidence that the non-built extensions are really needed before I went out of my way to fix it up, though. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
