Am Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2007 03:57 schrieb Walter Barnes: >That looks good but the problem is that the prerequisites include things > that are not a part of LFS (a working unprivledged user acount and an > internet connection).
And that's great. That good, very good. And I really hope it never will be changes. Never! > But even if a person has been working on an off-the-shelf Linux > distro at home for about a year they may not know all the ins and outs of > configuring a system from scratch. People you are talking now really should work quite a bit longer or get Knoppix. No, not lifeCD of LFS, because they never can admire the great work done on it. > Ideally, one should be able to boot into > their new system then use BLFS to create all the neccesary configuration > files for bash, readline, etc. No. >Yes, you can always continue using the host system and chroot into the LFS > environment as suggested at the end of LFS but this is not an ideal > solution. It is the best. Best solution, best idea, best work ever done on it > Although a fresh LFS is not complete, It is. As the idea pretends, it couldn't be done better. > it is bootable and it does > have Texinfo so why can't BLFS be available as an info page? You are talking about what? LFS isn't BLFS and vice versa. LFS never should be just for those who want to start X ASAP. >From that time on you really understand everything happening during building LFS you are well preprared to start BLFS. You got even tips to have being prepared and even that's too much. EOT -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
