On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 2:28 PM Manuel Rego Casasnovas <r...@igalia.com>
wrote:
> If we have plans to fix issues on this feature later, why not fixing
> them before and then shipping when things look good?
>
> If we unprefix it, it'll kind of appear as a new Chromium feature that
> people can use, and they will expect it follows the spec.
I agree, for example people might (wrongfully) rely on
CSS.supports("background-image", "image-set(url(example.jpg) 1x)")
to mean that the full set of image-set features is supported.
I'm not sure people are more granular than that about feature detection but
we probably have data about that.
It might be wise to support the cases behind the prefix, and unprefix when
the behavior is close to complete and interoperable enough.
We don't need to rely on people posting bug reports when we know the issues
today by looking at the WPT failures.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAJn%3DMYaZ8G5c1z7okOcPROQcyzMn9_SYr7mpRdz8xwwUvn1shQ%40mail.gmail.com.
