----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: Bush's brand new enemy is the truth


> At 08:23 PM 3/27/2004 -0600 Dan Minette wrote:
> >3) If he is opposed to the Iraq war because he things it hurts the war
on
> >terrorism, then resigning about the time of the start of the Gulf war is
> >consistent with that being the point where he ceased to think he can do
> >more good from the inside...that the President's policy was wrong enough
to
> >quit over.
>
> His resignation letter, however is inconsistent with this theory:
>    http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20040323-111315-5436r.htm

Huh?  Have you ever read how to books on job transitions?  He was just
following quitting 101 when he did that.  You never write nasty stuff in a
resignation letter.  Especially to the president. You may  have your say
verbally before you resign, but once you decide to go, you keep it as
pleasant as possible. That's not the time to burn bridges.  Obviously,
after reflection, he decided to burn bridges, but the books state that,
even if you think you will do that eventually, you still accentuate the
positive in the resignation letter.

Dan M.


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to