Legs are short according to SWR curve

Chris
WB5ITT 

> On May 9, 2017, at 8:02 AM, Gayle Dotts via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:
> 
> Put an SWR meter to the 10 meter Alpha Delta DX-EE, results:
> 
> Set to CW
> 28.488   2.9
> 28.360   3.0
> 28.300   3.1 
> 
> the dipole is at 8 feet each side.
> 
> Any Advise?
> 
> Gayle
> KF5LVZ
> 
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Gayle Dotts <gayle.do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thank you guys.  I orientated the wires so that I could with little effort 
>> switch directions to accommodate. The degree of angle off straight up and 
>> down I can play with. Elevation on the mast in an inverted V is around 35 
>> feet.  
>> 
>> Gayle
>> KF5LVZ
>> 
>> PS:  I will say this from a 10M rotatable MFJ 1980 Moxon type antenna to now 
>> a new Alpha Delta DX EE........
>> For observations on the 20M, 40M and 80M........traffic feels like it has 
>> increased 70% on all bands with stations I had not heard before or the 
>> ability to hear before. The 10M I will have to observe using the 10M nets 
>> coming up to comment on.
>> 
>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Jonathan Guthrie via BVARC 
>>> <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:
>>> As far as the North/South vs East/West question goes, if you know where you 
>>> want your signal to go, then you should absolutely orient your dipole 
>>> broadside to that direction.  If you don't know where you want your signal 
>>> to go, or don't yet care, then do what people typically do and put it up in 
>>>       whichever direction is most convenient.  If you've got the money, the 
>>> time, and the space, you can always set up two of them at right angles to 
>>> each other and switch between them, depending on which one brings in the 
>>> louder signal.
>>> 
>>> As far as making it straight goes (I think that's what you're asking, if 
>>> it's not, then please correct me) then as long as the legs aren't too close 
>>> together it won't have a huge effect on the radiation pattern.  A right 
>>> angle is probably not "too close".  I don't believe that the radiation will 
>>> be substantially less efficient, but you may get the energy directed in a 
>>> peculiar direction.  The thing is, unless you know what you're trying to 
>>> achieve, the thing to do is to put something up and see what you get.  If 
>>> you find that you communicate really well to nowhere you want to talk to, 
>>> then consider making changes or even trying your hand at some modelling to 
>>> see what it's really doing.
>>> 
>>> The thing to understand is that all antennas interact with the environment 
>>> that they're in.  That means that unless it's well isolated from nearly 
>>> everything your signal will go off in weird directions because it's near 
>>> the metal in your house or a shed or a fence or whatever.  Trying to 
>>> anticipate that is of limited use, and probably not worth the effort until 
>>> you know what you're trying to do.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 5/7/2017 8:18 PM, Gayle Dotts via BVARC wrote:
>>>> Setting up a inverted V multiband dipole 30 feet in the air and was 
>>>> wondering should I orient the wires to begin with so broadside to the 
>>>> dipole is North and South  or should I orient it for East and West 
>>>> broadside?  I do know that broadside is where most of my signals will come 
>>>> from...or does it really matter??  Also usually one sets up dipoles wires 
>>>> so the combined asmith is close to 180 degrees.  Can I do a 90 degree 
>>>> combined asmith......  or will that decrease my signals?  
>>>> Thank you for your thoughts guys, I appreciate it!
>>>> 
>>>> Gayle Dotts
>>>> KF5LVZ
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> BVARC mailing list
>>>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>>> Message delivered to ka8...@ka8kpn.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Jonathan Guthrie KA8KPN
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> BVARC mailing list
>>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>> Message delivered to gayle.do...@gmail.com
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Message delivered to setxtele...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to