lablGTK2 on linux is not fragile! Its robust, well designed, and produces nice guis! (at least on debian. props to the packagers and developers, if you're listening)
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:36 PM, ben kuin <benk...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the main problem is the lack of cross platform gui that looks > good on windows. > > LablTk: ok only for simple gui > LablGtk: fragile on linux, bad on windows > qt: I once tried to create bindings for a newer qt release ( > > 4.2), I didn't finished it, but I think it would be doable. The big > problem though is the huge qt dependency with this blackboxy C++/moc > thing . _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
