Dear Nishant,

XDS_ASCII.HKL contains corrected, scaled, but not merged reflections. 
You can specifically ask XDS to merge your data, but I would not do so unless 
really necessary - you loose a lot of information.

I would like to offer a different opinion to Graeme's:
You can read XDS_ASCII.HKL into pointless and aimless and provide aimless with 
the option 'onlymerge'. This way aimless merges the data, but it does not 
rescale them.

XDS performs a couple of corrections in the CORRECT step, the output of which 
is XDS_ASCII.HKL. And while XDS is extremely well documented, I am not sure 
aimless takes into account how XDS treats the data. I would therefore trust 
the step of scaling to the same author and continue with XDS_ASCII.HKL.

Best,
Tim


On Monday, November 21, 2016 11:37:15 AM Nishant Varshney wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Just to understand more, the XDS_ASCII.HKL file generated after running XDS
> contains scaled and merged reflections?
> 
> Moreover, what happens exactly, if you use XDS_ASCII.HKL file in AIMLESS
> instead of INTEGRATE.HKL file??
> 
> I ran AIMLESS separately, one using already scaled XDS_ASCII.HKL and
> another using INTEGRATE.HKL and I found that in the run using XDS_ASCII.HKL
> little lesser total number of observation but marginally better statistics.
> 
> Thanks
> Nishant
> 
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Andreas Forster <docandr...@gmail.com>
> 
> wrote:
> > Dear Wei,
> > 
> > if you process your data with XDS, the best is probably to do the scaling
> > in XDS (CORRECT) and be done with it.  If you want to use Aimless for
> > merging, you can turn off scaling with the ONLYMERGE keyword or use SCALES
> > CONSTANT.
> > 
> > All best.
> > 
> > 
> > Andreas
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Wei Wang <ww2...@columbia.edu> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> Is there a way to let xds_par use less than all processors/threads on the
> >> machine? Sometimes I would like to process something else while XDS is
> >> running.
> >> 
> >> Another question is related to the scaling procedure. My understanding is
> >> that the XDS already does the scaling during correction. So if I follow
> >> the
> >> XDS-Aimless route, then probably I should let Aimless do "skip scaling
> >> and
> >> only merge"? Please elucidate me on this issue.
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> 
> >> Wei
> 
> --
> Dr. Nishant Kumar Varshney,
> IISc-ICTP Fellow
> XRD2 Beamline, Elettra-Sincrotrone,
> In Area Science Park,
> Basovizza, S.S. 14, Km 163,5,
> 34012 Trieste, Italy
> +39-040-375 8737 (office ESP4 P1 031)
> +39-040-375-8435 (XRD2 beamline)
> +39 3318809798 (Mobile)
-- 
--
Paul Scherrer Institut
Dr. Tim Gruene
- persoenlich -
Principal Investigator
Biology and Chemistry
OFLC/102
CH-5232 Villigen PSI

Phone: +41 (0)56 310 5297

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to