Russel Madere wrote: > > I disagree that abolition was the economic driving force of The War of > Northern Aggression. It was deeper than that. Abolition would have had a > minor economic effect on the South in 1861. The South would have moved to > the system that has existed since 1865 with resident farmers, etc. It was > the Industrial Revolution that was the major economic force. And where were > most of the industries. > Maybe. But Abolition would have had a MAJOR impact on the folks with the money and the power. Paying wages would have cut into their profits. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... eric . laney
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... Braver, Ben
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... Braver, Ben
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... eric . laney
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... eric . laney
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... Russel Madere
- Re: The Bushwacking continues... John Allred
- Re: The Bushwacking continues... eric . laney
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... eric . laney
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... Russel Madere
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... John Allred
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... Maureen
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... Russel Madere
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... Ben Arledge
- Re: The Bushwacking continues... Joseph Thompson
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... Angel Stewart
- Indulge me.. Angel Stewart
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... Angel Stewart
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... Ben Arledge
- Re: The Bushwacking continues... Jim McAtee
- RE: The Bushwacking continues... Angel Stewart