> I'm not convinced it's that simple. ... I'm not
> convinced that any
> given informant, even providing very reliable
> information, would
> consider providing it to them, knowing that they've
> revealed a source
> (any source) in the past.
>
I don't agree but I respect your view.
I do think that if the source was the DNC then it
might become a criminal investigation and that will
cause a huge problem. If they just say it's not the
DNC a lot of preasure will go away.
-sm
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
