watergate/dirty tricks, remember that (as far as we know) there is no
burglary in this picture.
Possibly if the allegation is untrue there might be a basis for libel
but it would have to be proved untrue, and that is a civil matter
anyway.
Did I just see that someone is now offering a reward for proof that
Bush served in Alabama?
:)
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: The Sam Factor! (Fox News can legally lie?)
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not convinced it's that simple. ... I'm not
> convinced that any
> given informant, even providing very reliable
> information, would
> consider providing it to them, knowing that they've
> revealed a source
> (any source) in the past.
>
I don't agree but I respect your view.
I do think that if the source was the DNC then it
might become a criminal investigation and that will
cause a huge problem. If they just say it's not the
DNC a lot of preasure will go away.
-sm
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
