> There was no peace.
Good work, but how many suicide bombings were there? Most of the
statistics you've reported are less than 3 summer months in Chicago,
but that's just a guess. A better metric of peace would be to look at
business transactions between the Israelis and the Palestinians. I'm
guessing you'll see massive drop between today and 1999.
In any event, all of this discussion is rhetorical. The point is:
1.) Israelis (and supporters of Israel) feel as if the Palestinians
are senselessly murdering them so they are kill the Palestinians.
2.) Palestinians feel Israelis are senslessly murdering them so
they're killing the Israelis.
Personally I have no doubt that had Mr. Arafat been negotiating in
good faith the region would now be at peace.
My question is, how can you fairly say one side is better than the other?
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
