I don't know about this scenario. It's got a vigilante justice feel to it. If I were investigating, I'd be making sure that he didn't shoot first and then drag them over to his property.
<snip> Caller: "Boom. You're dead." (Sounds of gunshots) "Get the law over here quick. I've managed to get one of them, he's in the front yard over there. He's down, the other one is running down the street. I had no choice. They came in the front yard with me, man. I had no choice. </snip> This makes it sound like he was hunting them. Reminds me of the southpark episode where Jimbo and Ned get around hunting regulations by yelling "It's coming right for us!" in order to kill the animal in "self-defense" On 11/27/07, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Funny were talking about this the other day. Anyone read this? Honestly, I > think this guy should get off scot-free. But he'll probably get fucked in > the end, and while he's in jail, some shit-dick will break into his house > and steal all his shit. > > Protecting Neighbor's Home Self-Defense?Testing "Castle Doctrine," Grand > Jury To Decide If Texas Man Was Right To Kill Burglars > http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/16/national/main3511528.shtml > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade to ColdFusion 8 and integrate with Adobe Flex http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:247042 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
