> Jim wrote: > Although the question may still be open as to how an observer might affect > the outcome of wave function collapse there's nothing that even remotely > suggests that that outcome would be "what we want it to be". >
Hmm, I wasn't connecting anything to QM specifically, simply pointing out that, at present, it's the state of the art in understanding reality. Therefore if Buddhism is the study how to best experience reality, and physics is the study of what reality is, then reality's origins or causes must be revealed by the state of physics study in some future state (when we can explain the cause of the Big Bang for example). Christianity, on the other hand, claims to have already answered the question of reality's origin/cause. Seems to me that Christianity and physics are both the study of the origin of reality. If that's true, and we're calling Christianity religion, then mustn't we also call physics religion? Where's the flaw in reasoning? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get involved in the latest ColdFusion discussions, product development sharing, and articles on the Adobe Labs wiki. http://labs/adobe.com/wiki/index.php/ColdFusion_8 Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:247926 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
