Nope, I looked at those posts, the use of scumbag was meant to claim we were all scumbags, and shows me where the author is coming from.
Jerry Johnson wrote: > Of course it is relevant. > > This is one imagined circumstance. >> "Now imagine you have some CIA or military officer" > > This is a very different circumstance, to me implying a rogue or > unstable officer who is not using the torture as a last resort. >> "Now imagine you have some scumbag CIA or military officer" > > Very different imaginings. > > Because the normal CIA or military officer is _not_ a scumbag, the > adjective is both necessary and telling. > > On Feb 13, 2008 3:40 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This post: >> >> "Now imagine you have some scumbag CIA or military officer" >> >> Means nothing they have to say is relevant to me or to any true level >> discussion of the topic, plus without video and photos I call bullshit. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:254228 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
