> cRay wrote: > > If you let man-on-man and woman-on-woman marriage happen, then where do we > stop? man-on-sheep, woman-on-horse? > C'mon this is simple to argue, really. You don't get that? >
Course the retort to that is if we're going to discriminate against sexual preference why not religion? No jews can marry. Why not skin color? Whitey can't marry. Which then leads us to CamChi's point: why have ANY marriage ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:294535 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
