On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Justin Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > Since the middle ages, marriage in most Christian > realms was seen as a religious matter (never mind that marriage as an > institution pre-dates any of the current major religions).
Except for the Holy Church of the Rainbow. Which is fine. Anyone should be able to express their of religious selves, straight, gay, or honeybee. > I'd like to see the > same rights and benefits extended to everyone who wants to get together > (heterosexuals, homosexuals, polyamorous groups, whatever) regardless > of what it's ultimately called by the state. Right - I think govt should never have stepped being a body to "approve" a religious institution's construct. An "incorporated union of two humans" is fine. The caca everyone keeps stepping in is that "marriage" is religious and secular at the same time. Separation of church and state wasn't such a bad idea I thought. -Camero ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:294577 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
