>If you let man-on-man and woman-on-woman marriage happen, then where do we
>stop?  man-on-sheep, woman-on-horse?
>C'mon this is simple to argue, really. You don't get that?

funny you know that was the same arguments used when there were efforts to 
overturn the laws forbidding interracial marriage. The arguments then were pure 
crud as much as they are now.


>
>(For the google monster and any chance of getting hired anywhere in my post
>DMC afterlife, this was VERY tongue-in-cheek.  The sarcasm overfloweth...I
>could care less about who marries who.)
>
>
>
>> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:294546
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to